Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShareCAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:46, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ShareCAD

ShareCAD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A nonnotable website that contains a viewer for 3D models. The only potentially reliable source cited, a book from Springer International, is a trivial mention. I've done some searching and all I've turned up are some listicles on an unreliable website. I do not believe this meets WP:NWEB, WP:NSOFTWARE or WP:GNG. MrOllie (talk) 11:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; while it sounds neat, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot to it. There is no way to get the actual software, for example, and it doesn't really tie into anything else, i.e. the only thing to know about it is that some people have a domain name where they have decided to run a web application. As the nominator says, there are not reliable sources to give any indication of significance beyond "there's some website online". jp×g 04:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.