Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Mack (mayor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Mack (mayor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former mayor of a town of 600 individuals, only notable for his age that he was elected. All news stories are passing mentions, fails wp:blp1e delete Pokerkiller (talk) 17:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, another not notable enough to warrant an article of its own. Kierzek (talk) 02:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unfortunately as there's not much and stories like happen quite frequently and, if needed, he could simply be mentioned at the town's article but I'm not seeing much need for this. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mayor of a very small settlement which barely even qualifies for the title of village. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing in Wikipedia's inclusion standards grants an automatic notability freebie to the youngest, oldest or other-superlativest mayor of a particular place, if that place isn't one whose mayors would already be eligible for an article under WP:NPOL #3 — and two articles isn't enough to demonstrate that he passes that. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. That reminds me of the guy who won a local Mr. Leather contest 14 years ago and still wears his badge and sash every day. Bearian (talk) 18:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Get out of my head, bear brother! (*grin*) Bearcat (talk) 19:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Same as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Seeley (2nd nomination), article isn't notable and should be deleted. MrWooHoo (talk) 00:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.