Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamone
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect (non-admin closure), per WP:SNOW and partial consensus the material should be in Michael Jackson. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 02:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Shamone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
DELETE - Because this is an encyclopedia, I don't care how famous Mr. Jackson is, a whole article for one of his wordings is scrapping the barrel. Lacks notability and makes the encyclopedia look tacky. — Realist2 01:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MergeRedirect into Michael Jackson. Nearly every singer mangles words; this particular instance is not notable just because of who did it. I also strongly doubt the assertion the "word" has popular usage. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]- How would merging this pile of poo help improve a featured article? — Realist2 01:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In this way. Now that the only smidgen of useful information that can be referenced has been thus merged, the article can be deleted and made a redirect. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 02:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, should we just go ahead and redirect? — Realist2 02:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I would. Also, thanks for cleaning up the syntax error in my reference. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 02:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, should we just go ahead and redirect? — Realist2 02:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In this way. Now that the only smidgen of useful information that can be referenced has been thus merged, the article can be deleted and made a redirect. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 02:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How would merging this pile of poo help improve a featured article? — Realist2 01:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If the information in this article is notable, it should be used in the MJ article. Asher196 (talk) 02:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.