Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shame About That

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There seems to be disagreement over whether this article satisfies WP:NSONG but the general consensus here is to Keep the article. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shame About That

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Shame About That (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources don't prove notability independent of the album the song comes from. Previous PROD was removed by User:GB_fan in favor of redirecting to the album article (which is my preferred solution), but the redirect was subsequently undone by User:Donaldd23 and now the article is back where it started, without any other subsequent changes to address my original issue. QuietHere (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Three Chords and the Truth (Sara Evans album) per nom. XtraJovial (talk) 18:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, single charted on Billboard. DonaldD23 talk to me 19:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, charted Billboard single with multiple sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, a charting single with reviews from The Washington Post. It was given a description from journalists and writers, as mentioned in the "background" section. The song correlates with Sara Evans' early career persona as a traditionally-oriented country vocalist. This article proves this to the reader in ways that the Three Chords and the Truth album could not. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Footnote: I've posed a query about this song's chart run at WT:SONGS, hoping to clear up my own apparent confusion at some of the policy in question. I'd prefer to see a consensus established there before this closes, if that's allowed, as it may have a significant effect on this AFD's outcome. Thank you for your patience. QuietHere (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NSONGS is clear that charting alone is not enough to meet notability criteria. None of the sources discuss the song at length, and that is what is required for notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Meets WP:NSONG per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shame_About_That&oldid=1086446480"