Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzad A. Rizvi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shahzad A. Rizvi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability provided (no secondary sources that back this up); no relevant, reliable sources included overall. These were indicated as a problem in July, and the article has been edited by the same account more than 40(!) times since then. Safety Cap (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Weapons-grade vanispamcruftisement and hyperbole by a WP:SPA (probably the article's subject, Sarizvi (talk · contribs)) … lacking WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 70.21.24.28 (talk · contribs) _{15:22, 9 August 2011 (UTC)}[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a bit of googlesearching and found zip in terms of coverage by independent reliable sources. Nsk92 (talk) 01:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After reading the first sentences of his book on GB I thought that if William McGonagall has a page then why not this subject? However, second thoughts led me to conclude that he had not yet reached McGonagall's level of fame although if he perseveres with his writing he might in future. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.