Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabana filmography

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Shabana (actress). King of 03:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shabana filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it is WP:LISTCRUFT ,violates the policy, WP:IINFO, has only one source which is a dead link which makes it unsourced,and was nominated for speedy deletion under WP:CSD A7. However the tag was removed by the page creator. -KAP03 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment A cursory WP:BEFORE search found two reliable sources for 10 films in the list. Also, the dead link was easily repaired. There may be other problems with that reference - determining whether it supports any content is non-trivial since it is a general reference without inline citations, for example - but the fact that it was dead is not a sound reason to delete the article.
questions The essay WP:LISTCRUFT lists twelve meanings. Please identify which one or ones you believe apply. The policy WP:IINFO gives four examples. Please explain which one you believe is relevant, if any. The list article has considerable room for improvement, both in content and in sourcing, but it isn't clear why we should be trigger-happy with the bazooka of AfD rather than keeping (or merging) and improving this filmography to the standard of, say, Katharine Hepburn performances. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.