Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shaadi Teri Bajayenge Hum Band

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. No significant coverage in reliable sources found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources inckuding the articles already cited in the entry. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 07:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - press releases for a future movie are not sufficient to support WP:NMOVIE criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NFILM. Created by Special:Contributions/MumbaiMediaEditor45 currently indef blocked as part of sock farm, so a high probability of this being UPE. WP:DENY applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article's creator has been confirmed as a sock puppet and blocked indefinitely.--Rpclod (talk) 11:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.