Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexism in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gender inequality in China. Michig (talk) 06:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism in China

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original reasearch, POV-riddled synthesis essay. Article would need a complete rewrite in order to comply with wiki policy. ^{Alles Klar,} Herr Kommisar 07:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gender inequality in China (note that gender equality does not 100% translate as sexism) but with absolutely no prejudice to recreate the article. The subject is clearly notable. Mkdw ^talk 07:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect without prejudice per Mkdw - and Der Kommisar, you might even want to be WP:BOLD and just do that now. There's nothing in the page history that requires deleting - it's just not a good article. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move Gender inequality in China content to this namespace. The WP topic should conform to the standard wording of these articles. Racism in India Sexism in India Racism in Poland ; this is the accepted WP pattern .-Samsara9 (talk) 11:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arguably, 'Sexism in (country)' is actually not the status quo. See Gender inequality in Thailand, Gender inequality in Australia, Gender inequality in Tonga, Gender inequality in Liberia, Gender inequality in Sudan, Gender inequality in El Salvador, Gender inequality in Honduras, Gender inequality in the English Caribbean, Gender inequality in India, Gender inequality in the United States, etc. The reason for this is that 'gender equality' or inequality covers a wider range of study that includes sexism such as demographics and gender imbalance. 'Sexism in China' would be a legitimate sub article. Furthermore, not sure why you included 'Racism in (country)' because technically 'Gender inequality in (country)' follows the same naming convention; being "(subject) in (country)". Keep in mind that despite being two words, it's one subject. Mkdw ^talk 19:47, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Poorly written. If you want to create the page, you should write much more sourced contents.--Syngmung (talk) 15:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Typical knee-jerk reaction As usual, my stalker/vandal has deleted all my content, and then exactly as I said would happen editor #3 steps in, and says, 'hey this is a really small stub.' I am preparing an RfC or AI for the vandal, and then we can resume the regular draft. -Samsara9 (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Observe the timestamps. The comment you're replying to was left by someone who saw your version of the article. I actually added the only reliable source the article has ever had. But whatever. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:13, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gender inequality in China. This article is in such a poor shape that in the version I am reading it doesn't discuss sexism in China in any referenced or significant way, making it a fork of the gender inequality article. Now, the topic in itself is notable, but I don't see a reason to keep this poor stub alive when a much better, referenced subject on related topic exists. Feel free to ping me on talk if this is expanded, although I'd encourage the author to focus on improving their Sexism in South Korea article instead. Learn how to write one good article before creating a series of poor ones. That said, I very much appreciate the starting contributions; those are important topics and we badly need someone to write up on those. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gender inequality in China per above sound analyses. Cavarrone (talk) 06:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fai zan 10:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTAVOTE Ansh666 01:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to gender inequality in China in concurrence with Mkdw, NorthBySouthBaranof, Samsara9, and Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsjunky12 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above and maybe userify content as a reminder of what doesn't work here. Ansh666 01:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, but please retain history itself, as it may be useful in the future for research and quality improvement purposes. — Cirt (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would redirect per WP:SNOW, but also merge whatever useful was in the prior version that was cited. Bearian (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.