Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sesh Heri
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sesh Heri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fringe theorist and writer of unread science fiction whose only claim to notability is that a friend of his, another prolific fringe theorist, once described his ideas as "brilliant" but filled with "misunderstandings". No nontrivial GNews or Gbooks hits; web coverage appears limited to promotion for his books and unreliable/fringe sources. BLP article includes no references and no reliable sources. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 15:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I know what it is like to struggle but, nonetheless, I don't think this article is rooted in notability.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 06:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At this point, I do not see WP:NOTABILITY demonstrated. I did not independently look for sources though.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google Books throws up some brief mentions, but Google gives very little or nothing in reliable sources (not even the major sf websites), and I can't find anything in the big book review sites. The included references are not complete, with no indication of magazine issue numbers, page numbers, authors, article titles, etc. Fate is a long-running publication and a story there would help, but which Sunset Magazine is it? It doesn't sound like this one. In summary, no evidence of notability online; there may be some material in magazines but it's not clear which magazines or what they say. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.