Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensory words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sensory words

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is not an accepted new research term. It appears the article creator conceived the term and wrote the article to match. No evidence of real world notability of this concept. KDS4444 (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Rather sad that this needs to go, because it's actually quite well written by a new editor - but it's a magazine article or a blog, not an encyclopaedia article. Seems to be WP:OR with a few references thrown in. None of the references contains the phrase "sensory words", the second one is a blog and the third is only tangentially related to the theme of the article. Searching gets a number of hits relating to marketing or creative writing, but I didn't find anything discussing the term sufficiently in-depth. Neiltonks (talk) 12:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ending with "Now we have planted the seeds into your mind, allow your imagination to work, and conjure up its own magic…this is the power of sensory words!" -- I would call this a number of things. "Well written" is not one of them. Anyway, yes, delete per nom and without a trace of sadness. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR and essay.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an essay, not an encyclopedia article; as well as being original research. Edward321 (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.