Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selita Ebanks
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Selita Ebanks
Gives little indication of notability and cites no sources. Only a few hundred google hits, but some of the first ten use the phrase "super model". Weak delete unless better resons for notability are supplied and supored by proper cited sources. DES (talk) 02:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Context: she is a lingerie model for Victoria's Secret. She's being currently hyped as a replacement for Tyra Banks on CBS' Victoria's Secret fashion show: Victoria's Secret hopes it can fill the void created by the departure of the spectacularly voluptuous Banks with "the next generation of Victoria's Secret 'Angels' " -- to wit, "new modeling sensations" Selita Ebanks and Izabel Goulart, who will be making their VS fashion show debuts on CBS. - Ted and Tyra's Synchronized Exits, Washington Post, October 18, 2005. See here for bio. I couldn't say whether that all adds up to notable. Tearlach 04:50, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Models are a dime a dozen, and this one is, as yet, no more notable than any other. I vote Delete. Eusebeus 07:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now without prejudice; only 636 Google hits is low for an aspiring supermodel. [1] A new article can be written when her fame is clearly established. --Metropolitan90 08:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Metropolitan90. KillerChihuahua?!? 15:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The content of this entry is taken more or less directly from the Who2 profile of Selita Ebanks at http://www.who2.com/selitaebanks.html. Two sentences are copied verbatim.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.