Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seial
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. per WP:DICTIONARY j⚛e deckertalk 16:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Seial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary Mediran talk to me! 04:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. STATic message me! 06:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:DICTIONARY, as the nominator says. — sparklism hey! 07:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is not a word that I nor Merriam-Webster's 10th have heard, but even if it were there is no suggestion that the article could be expanded beyond a dictionary definition. Cnilep (talk) 01:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.