Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seeta (1960 film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 01:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Seeta (1960 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Film appears to fail WP:NFILM. Was deleted via PROD in 2020, but was undeleted in 2021. No additions have been made to the article since that time to help establish notability. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Severestorm28 01:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. We should decide whether to go with Seeta or Seetha as our transliteration throughout, though. I've added some refs. It was the most successful Malayalam language film of its time. Dsp13 (talk) 12:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep Per Dsp13, seems to be notable film of the period.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More time to find a better source for highest grossing Malayam film, current one is blogspot.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Systemic bias, not a hoax, significance is proved - take your pick. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Dsp13 Akshaypatill (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.