Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seedpeer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seedpeer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is just another one of many torrent sites and unlike The Pirate Bay or KickassTorrents it is not recognizable enough for a Wikipedia page (Alexa rank 138,238) rayukk | talk 10:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found nothing to suggest it's independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 07:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non notable site, Fials GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 18:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.