Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SeatMarket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SeatMarket

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently completely non-notable company, started in August last year. Its existence, and just about nothing else, is confirmed by its Companies House listing. Not one mention on Google news, a grand total of 85 hits on Google, of which about the first dozen actually relate to this company. Neither of the two sources in the article mention the company. Nowhere near meeting the WP:GNG, let alone WP:CORP. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kill the ads (speedy delete) Does not in any way at all meet WP:GNG and is probably advertising. I would write a longer explanation however, it’s not worth the time typing. It’s clearly non-encyclopaedic content. →ὦiki-Coffee^{(talk to me!)} _{(contributions)} 12:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.