Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaman Kowalski

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 19:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seaman Kowalski

Seaman Kowalski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently notable on his own. Does not meet WP:GNG. ubiquity (talk) 20:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This character has no substantial mention on Google, outside of being listed as a character on VttBotS and of being played by the actor Del Monroe. He has only a single listing in the show's article. No sources are referenced. Language appears very subjective and better suited for a fan wiki. -Mindfrieze (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - It fails to properly establish notability, so it has no need to exist in its current form. TTN (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A devoted, largely in-universe account of Seaman Kowalski on the old Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea TV series, to which I was positively addicted, as a kid. Entirely WP:OR, unreferenced, and not a notable enough fictional character even if we did have refs. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.