Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Señorita Mexico U.S

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Señorita Mexico U.S

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I rather doubt the notability, but it isn;t my subject field. DGG ( talk ) 10:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only people who think this is notable are the organization themselves, since every single source is a press release. I looked around in Spanish-language sources and couldn't find anything reliable. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 05:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable source coverage provided in teh article or found in my searches. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.