Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooter-rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scooter-rock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Apparent case of WP:NFT; neologism made up purely to describe the genre of one (non-notable) band. No evidence term is in widespread use; non-notable and unverifiable. ~Matticus ^U_C 06:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:MADEUP. Chris (talk) 08:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as WP:UTTERBOLLOCKS! -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 11:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete made-up genre of a single band we don't even have an article on. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable/WP:NFT. We actually did have an article about the one band of this genre, but I speedy-deleted it after it was tagged {{db-band}}. DMacks (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (can't remember link) It's probably something made up in a day. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 20:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.