Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScienceBook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ScienceBook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website lacks the substantial RS refs that confer notability. Tagged for notability -- and zero refs -- for over 2 years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as copyright violation. The article text has been cut and pasted all sorts of everywhere[1], and at this point I am not particularly concerned whether the Wikipedia article has priority or not; this is not an encyclopedia article. And besides, the only science books anybody needs are Aristotle's Physics, the Almagest, and the Physiologus. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy DeleteLuciferWildCat (talk) 00:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.