Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schindewolf Intermediate School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 23:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schindewolf Intermediate School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A blatant advertisement for a school; unnecessary and obviously spam. Jmlk17 06:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as a somewhat useful article, at least potentially if not currently. It might not have the name recognition of Chuck Norris, but if I were considering sending my kids there I'd appreciate an informative description of the place. Remember WP:SENSE and WP:IGNORE. --
  xDanielx
  ^Talk 07:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • "I'd appreciate an informative description of the place"... for which the school's own website should be appropriate. In its current form, which is a simple duplication of the information and weasel-words that should be available on the school's website, while showing no notability outside existing and no sources independant of the school itself (although Wikipedia:Introduction appears to be a source) the article would best be redirected with possible weak minor merge to an article on the district the school is in, if identifiable. Not-a-keep not-a-vote. -- saberwyn 11:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Bduke 11:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:N: No claim of notability whatsoever. WP:DIR: Wikipedia is not a school catalogue--Victor falk 13:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Victor falk. --Fang Aili ^talk 13:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No notability established Corpx 05:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment no arguments have been offered having any relation to thw actual content of the article--and all are the same as for the other afds, both pro and con: I would like any opinion about a possible solution: closing every one of these afds where nothing individiual is said as no consensus, on the grounds that no specific agrguments are been proposed. DGG (talk) 07:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into Klein Independent School District per established precedent here. TerriersFan 00:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.