Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savvycom
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Savvycom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:CORP criteria or WP:GNG the 3 external sources who gave them "awards" are referencing websites. I have come across Clutch several times and to be referenced and noted you only have to have a linkedin profile and supply 3 customer references and they carry out a phone survey to note your company... Domdeparis (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Minor/passing coverage, minor awards, not notable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.