Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Savonian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Savonian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small list page and is not needed - created by a non-Wikipedia user. Whenaxis (talk) 23:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unnecessary disambiguation per WP:DISAMBIG (and for that matter, WP:NOTADICTIONARY). - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnecessary as there are unlikely to be additional nouns, and I could find no notable people named Savonian. The adjectival form and two noun usages means that things can be disambiguated at the hatnote level. I disagree that WP:NOTADICTIONARY applies in this instance. --Bejnar (talk) 02:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, not a needed dab. fetchcomms☛ 03:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-As the AFC creator I thought it seemed like it could be of use at the time, but if the community sees otherwise I'm Neutral..--SKATER ^Speak. 03:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Savonia. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.