Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save us.222

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. There is a huge amount of speculation and original research being conducted by all sorts of folks on the internet, and Wikipedia should not be one of those places (to that effect, I've been forced to protect Chris Jericho and may have to do the same with its talk page). With regards to the research and opinions about the meaning of the spot, most wrestling fans know what its about, but that doesn't make the ad notable, nor the waves of fan research valid. Getting this out of the way NOW to keep the nonsense at bay, but its going to be a bit of a battle until either WWE or Mr. Jericho makes an official statement, or Mr. Jericho appears on WWE television. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 12:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Save us.222

Save us.222 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article was prodded but tag was removed so I've put it up for an AfD. Although we have about 50,000 wrestling articles, I don't think we need one on a mysterious phrase seen in a commercial. This is an essentially promotional article about a completely non-notable topic. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 07:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete: An advert for an event which has yet to happen is hardly every likely to be notable unless it was banned or if it was in another way extremely unusual. This article appears part of the ad campaign to raise awareness of the PPV event in October. B1atv 07:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Definitely NN. Spawn Man 07:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per B1atv.  Kip Smithers  10:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN. Beyond what the above said, it's just chock full of speculation and weasel words. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.