Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save the Eyes Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Save the Eyes Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Only coverage seems to be a fairly recent fundraising event. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Fails WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV .Started only in 2016 not notable at this point and only coverage in Non RS sources is about fund raising.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think we need more than few recent newspaper reports, all rewriting one another and essentially being a press release rewrite, before we can consider this company notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. −Domdeparis (talk) 07:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.