Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saul Goodman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closing as Speedy Keep per WP:SK1 and WP:SNOW. The article is a mess but the subject is unquestionably notable. (non-admin closure)-Ad Orientem (talk) 14:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saul Goodman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:FANCRUFT. jps (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The page could use better sourcing but the subject is significant appearing in two popular television series. Might be worth merging but not deleting. Meatsgains (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourcing is horrible, but the character was significant enough to warrant a show. Does need more references relating to the character and significance, rather than just a plot listing.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not only is Saul a major character in two hit series, he's become emblematic of a particular type of lawyer (or lawyer cliche): e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6] --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Eminently notable as a character in his own right (see e.g. this article from the Illinois Bar Journal). The article needs an overhaul to cut the overlong plot summary content and focus more on the wider real-life context and influence of the character. —Nizolan ^(talk) 02:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The character is a major character in two hit series, and therefore is notable. Ethanlu121 (talk) 12:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.