Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saul Fathi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 19:35, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Saul Fathi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author of 3 books,all three self-published, none with more than a few library holdings DGG ( talk ) 03:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (talk to me) @ 08:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (natter) @ 08:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (lecture) @ 08:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I've tagged it as a speedy since it looks to be copyvio from his website, but just in case I wanted to voice my argument here. I admire his accomplishments, as I find them personally impressing, but unfortunately he just doesn't meet any of the very strict requirements for notability standards here on Wikipedia. There's no coverage for him or for his works. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. A reasonable search for additional sources finds nothing meeting WP:IRS. Duplication detector reveals blocks of text directly taken from website. Page and page history have the appearance of being created in order to direct readers to personal website or self published books. BusterD (talk) 15:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.