Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sattabut Laedeke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sattabut Laedeke

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Most roles appear to be supporting cast with only one lead role in 12-part TV drama and its sequel. Notability of that drama is not established. There are also issues with quality of sourcing and non-neutral language. Probably WP:TOOSOON. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 12:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There's considerable mention of him in entertainment news, but most of it is the usual rehash of press releases promoting the series. A few profile pieces in celebrity websites, which are mostly just postings of his Instagram pictures. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 11:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Just like Paul_012 has said, there is actually no significant coverage from secondary (so non primary promotional ones) sources to actually pass WP:GNG and due to lack of his notable roles he fails WP:NACTOR. He may be notable in future for WP:TOOSOON, but not now. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.