Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sativa Rose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sativa Rose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD removed without policy/guideline based explanation or article improvement. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet the notability guidelines for this type of actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. Fails GNG without non-trivial RS coverage. My own search for sources mainly got cast listings. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLPs require better sourcing then this.n Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of notability. Northern Antarctica (₵) 04:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.