Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarcastic Gamer
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Greeves (talk • contribs) 15:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sarcastic Gamer
- Sarcastic Gamer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Tagged as A7 (no assertion of notability) and G11 (blatant advertising) speedy. I don't believe this article is speediable. There are some sources that indicate some notability, and there is something wrong with the tone, but not beyond being salviagble. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I've declined the speedy tags, article attempts to assert notability Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Well, what exactly do you find wrong with "the tone"? I've tried to make the article as unbiased as possible. Regua (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I replied on your talk page. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This seems like a decent article about a fairly popular website, nothing looks wrong. -Kiljoy
Keep seems to be a rather notable blog. Doc Strange (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't appear to be a notable blog. Indications of real world impact seem scarce. MLA (talk) 12:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The parodies have millions of views and they have been on television, it seems like a pretty notable blog. KiljoyPS3 (talk) 17:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.