Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Trevis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Trevis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a casting director - not an inherently notable position, even in connection with notable films - who happens to have some notable relatives. All working links to sources on the page are to IMDb or the subject's personal webpage or organizational webpage. BD2412 T 18:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 18:56, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to enough reliable sources to pass notability. IMDb is not reliable, and we should not be building article on it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject does not appear notable enough to justify an article. Article was almost entirely created by user:Sarahtrevis and an ip address, throwing serious doubt that an independent third party would consider the person in question notable enough for an article. Sources, as mentioned, also do not justify notability. A MINOTAUR (talk) 03:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.