Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankha Subhra Devbarman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sankha Subhra Devbarman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article on a non-notable person (writer? civil servant? son-of-a-politician?), so much so that I would have requested speedy but there's a bit of a history there already. Fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO.

Also, there's at least one of these in drafts, so if this AfD results in deletion it may be worth salting the name, as the creating editor seems persistent. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article as written does not establish general notability or author notability. There is also a draft, which can be kept if the article is deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The version that is now in draft space was moved from article space to draft about 24 hours ago, after which time this version was created in article space. This behavior is characteristic of an attempt to game the system by creating multiple copies. Concur with nominator's recommendation that the title should be ECP salted after deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG, and most likely a case of UPE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I gave the author the benefit of the doubt and the opportunity to improve the article. I don't think giving them any further chances will achieve anything. Deb (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.