Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 11:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Smith

Lack of third party sources to demonstrate an artist's notability. Enigma^msg 19:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable yet. Johnbod (talk) 03:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn...per above...Modernist (talk) 23:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No refs or third party other than artists own website. Not notable. Artypants, ^Babble 11:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lean toward Keep. Hrmmm. Google News throws up a few refs, though relatively minor peices and some better than others. The Internet doesn't seem able to decide whether the artist is male, or female, helpfully. A disambiguation page (Alexander Smith) here claims the eponymous artist is male. Let's see what we have...

Random top tens: geek artists Scotsman Oct 18, 2008
Arnies One Joke Movie Made Into Work Of Art Sunday Herald Dec 10, 2008
Recycler les « vieux » ordinateurs (in French) macplus.net Apr 4, 2005
Art reviews: Alex Gross and Sandy Smith The Scotsman 29 January 2009
Central Utah Art Center - Alex Gross-Sandy Smith
some blog & TrendHunter.com magazine (blog format), and corsespace visual arts group (?) –Whitehorse1 03:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.