Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Miguel, Jordan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jordan, Guimaras#Barangays. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 10:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

San Miguel, Jordan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A barangay article that resembles more of a directory or listing of establishments and landmarks than a real encyclopedic article. Such type of Philippines-related articles have been point of contention for the past decade, with latest discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive47#Are barangays notable? (can we please have a consensus now?) and the then-active Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarusan. Consensus remains that only barangays that are really notable by reliable sources are considered as worthy to have Wikipedia articles.

For this barangay, it contains basic info like statistics, barangay captain, and natural description like geographical location. But most of it is essentially a directory, and this violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY rule. It does contain some sources, but these do not mainly talk about the barangay itself and are mainly about the landmarks that are listed here, thus all are not reliable. This article, therefore, should not benefit from WP:GEOLAND and must be nuked. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.