Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Diego Film Week (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego Film Week

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per my exact same reasoning last time: This is of dubious notability at best and has been discretely spammed throughout wikipedia for the last two years but I can find no significant coverage and what little coverage is found, is hyper local. No evidence this meets WP:NEVENT or WP:GNG and is just a minor regional event. Praxidicae (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete upholding the previous AfD. Looks like a user that has now been blocked gamed the system a bit creating a similar article for a different year and then moving the article to this location. That new page was also tagged for notability concerns via WP:NPP. Despite the WP:REFBOMB in the lead, I don’t really think all those pass GNG. -2pou (talk) 06:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The sources that aren't just the festival's own website are just local coverage, or listings of upcoming events. There does not seem to be any kind of substantial coverage of this film festival in anything beyond local sources. The article tries to claim notability by asserting that a notable actor presented, but as notability is not inherited, this does not actually confer any notability to the festival itself. Rorshacma (talk) 17:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per rationale given above. Ktrimi991 (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article for event of dubious notability. Dorama285 (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.