Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sammarinese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mduvekot (talk • contribs) 13:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sammarinese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary Mduvekot (talk) 00:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. This was clearly as mistake, and the article has been expanded. Mduvekot (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And yet almost every other ethnicity has a page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Leaning keep. The article has since been expanded beyond a dictionary definition. Granted, the two additional cited sources are tertiary sources and should be replaced by secondary sources, and I'm not sure how reliable Everyculture.com is. However, the fact that this is an article about the people of an entire country makes me inclined to think this subject is notable. Will do some more digging. Mz7 (talk) 04:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.