Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Omo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Omo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE as no indication this individual has had the necessary WP:SIGCOV needed to sustain an article. References provided merely link to the individual's own portfolio pages, more in line with WP:PROMO. Also possible WP:COI and vanity, per article talk page. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Nigeria. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:20, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It is WP:TOOSOON for this illustrator and digital graphic designer to have an article, as they do not yet meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. He may be ready in a number of years if independent significant coverage materializes in reliable sources in the future. Netherzone (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Visual arts. Netherzone (talk) 16:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Article didn't reference the artist's portfolio, but to a reliable and different sources by independent publishers.Thus, I still think the artist is worth having an article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikifixR (talk • contribs) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage. Sources listed seem to be industry specific or blogs or content provided by the artist. WP:TOOSOON. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Simply fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.