Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Kolias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Kolias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

not notable enough person Mayumashu 17:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable landlord. --Charlene 02:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wealth does not equal notability. --Infrangible 04:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep CEO of a billion-dollar company does seem to equal notability. Quoted by Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail in just the last month. 832 Google hits. -- TedFrank 04:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above Macktheknifeau 05:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep, tagged for references since December, lacking sources and failing WP:A does not make it easy to keep this article. Alf^Photoman 14:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Assuming the article can become referenced, the person seems to be plenty notable with his position as CEO, large wealth (being in the top 100 wealiest people in a G8 country seems to be notable to me), and charity work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NorseOdin (talk • contribs) 17:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep per NorseOdin. -- Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 07:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per NorseOdin. Added a reference along with some minor cleanup of the article. -- Black Falcon 05:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.