Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sachin G Lokapure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unotable person who keeps on getting the prod removed, can't find much notability Wgolf (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of any notability. Reads like an autobiography of a person who believes being awarded a patent is sufficient notability to be included here. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the person has a patent for a device that the article doesn't explain what it does. That's not notable enough, unless their alledged success has good secondary sourcing. As a sidenote, I also added WP:BLPPROD to the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302-it was a blp prod but I had to change it to a afd after the creator kept on removing it.Wgolf (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mentions in academic writing and journals only don't cut it for notability. Optakeover ^(Talk) 19:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find much on duckduckgo about this person other than they have a patent. Jerodlycett (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatant attempt at self-promotion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above no notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No signs of notability. Lakun.patra (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete - that this AfD was relisted is a wonder to my eyes. Tigraan (talk) 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - for reasons mentioned above BakerStMD T|C 19:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.