Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabitha Kumari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was close and relist due to interference by a sockfarm (CU). -Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 07:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sabitha Kumari

Only blog references, which fail WP:RS. A google search on the name gives no non-blog hits. Soman (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sabitha Kumari is a Known Criminal and wanted in India —Preceding unsigned comment added by TigersRus (talk • contribs) 09:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More Refference have been provided from The News see links

Sabitha's empire has spread to one sixth of India's country's total districts it should be mentioned in the books. --99.238.6.68 (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide more . I believe that should be enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThambeEeE (talk • contribs) 11:57, 21 February 2008 UTC

Article also has actual refferences. She is Indias Most Wanted --TigersRus (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- i can get more i believe that should be enough. More than Half of The Refferences are from The News sources --TigersRus (talk) 09:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I noticed that two of the blog posts had links to telegraph articles. However, those articles give little backing for any of the biographical info in the wikiarticle, they just state that there is a woman by this name, from andhra or jharkhand, in her 20s and have led maoist squad operations. Notability is a concern here. Is there any WP:RS on the claim that she's on 'Indias Most Wanted'? Any reputable source on her position in CPI(Maoist)? --Soman (talk) 09:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah and she is a Top Maoist. Look how many Pages are on her. --TigersRus (talk) 09:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sabitha Kumari is a Terrorist and she Leads a Maoist Army as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TigersRus (talk • contribs) 10:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Article has enough Refferences about her. --Thileepanmathivanan (talk) 10:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment and admin please note: Are you also using 99.238.6.68 to edit? Because you have both modified the above comment in the same way [1][2]. Please remember to log in when editing and do not edit an AfD discussion using both a username and an IP address. Thank you, cab (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 10:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- ATTN I WOULD LIKE THIS ARTICLE TO BE JUDGED BY THE WIKI List of India-related deletion discussions List of India-related deletion discussions --99.238.6.68 (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I already added it to the list of discussions 15 minutes ago. The administrator who evaluates all the arguments at the end of the debate to determine consensus may ignore arguments which do not accord with policy, but otherwise, any person who sees this debate, and not just those from the deletion sorting list, may comment on it. Finally, please add new comments in the appropriate place and not at the top, and indent them using an appropriate number of * at the beginning of the line. Thank you, cab (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are indefinite amount of resources too many and i garuntee 100% these articles are going to expand. User:Soman is just picking on articles i have created and nominating them for deletion and my articles are all information that are most upto date. I did nothing wrong i am just contributing like any other Wikipedian. See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LTTE_and_Maoist_Relations — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThambeEeE (talk • contribs) 11:57, 21 February 2008 UTC
- Sign your posts using ~~~~ and don't insert text into the middle of other user's comments. Unless of course, you are the same user as99.238.6.68, Special:Contributions/TigerRus, etc. cab (talk) 03:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~-- Sabitha Kumari is a Legend --ThambeEeE (talk) 11:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Who says she is a legend? It's your own personal opinion. Salih (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked as sock. utcursch | talk 06:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, this is an obvious case of sockpuppeting. Four separate AfDs and disruptions of the process are discussed at ANI. --Soman (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject may be notable only in the Police department. Salih (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Non notable Taprobanus (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Changed vote after claen up Taprobanus (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, you would think that a kingpin of this nature would receive more substantial coverage. --Dhartung | Talk 19:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and edit sharply per BLP. Remove the blogs, and keep only what is supported by the actual news accounts, which is not all that much, but i think enough for notability. and is there any actual evidence that the photograph actually shows her? DGG (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ For 1 year and give it a chance to expand. --HairyMan101 (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and admin please note: Account created six minutes before making this comment [3], and he moves/edits User:Thileepanmathivanan's and User:ThambeEeE's comments as if he owned them [4]. cab (talk) 03:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked as sock. utcursch | talk 06:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Article seems to be popular --Raninder (talk) 04:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC) — Raninder (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- I wasn't aware that "popular" had been redefined to mean "a single person keeps creating new user accounts to comment about it [5]". cab (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked as sock. utcursch | talk 06:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have gatherd more refferences as well, including the ones already posted

*http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1088710

*http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061124/asp/frontpage/story_7043800.asp

Most are from The News and are indicating that Sabitha Kumari is Leading The Maoists. Sabitha is Incharge of many Operations that are being carried in Andhra Pradesh see [6] and She made it on Front Page on News cast The Telegraph see [7] and [8] indicates she was leading attacks. Woman Sabitha Kumari seems to be popular and should be notable, she is mentioned as a Legenary Comrade on Maoists Website [9] .

However I can name you Wiki examples that are less popular than S.K.

--Jawan101 (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC) — Jawan101 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Blocked as sock. utcursch | talk 06:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Still no real basis for bio. The DNA link doesn't say much more than that she's a squad commander. --Soman (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note -- Right here see in the link DNA [10] it says Investigating officials are of the opinion that this new trend has evolved after 23-year old Sabita Kumari was unanimously elected as the commander-in-chief of the Maoist action squad of West Bengal" and further it says Born in Prabira village of Jharkhand and a science graduate from Dultongunj College, Kumari joined the Maoists in 2000. She is on the Chattisgarh most-wanted list and several cases are registered against her"

Theres more about her on the BlogSpot about her information when she was born etc... on Naxal websites as well. All these are from the News. so are you telling me shes not notable when she comes on the news frequently and also known as Legendary Sabita Kumar comrade a.k.a Commander of Andhra Pradesh district and west bengal etc.. i will get more Refs if you want --Jawan101 (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note Wiki Admins users : Soman and utcursch are both Sikh Extremist that are Racist towards Hindus becuase of past conflicts. They contribute only for Bad Faith towards us. they have multiple accounts as well. --Sikol99 (talk) 11:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also blocked as sock :). For the record, I'm not a Hindu or Sikh. utcursch | talk 13:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I ran a google search myself and failed to find many external sources or significant press coverage on the subject. At this time I do not feel the article meets the WP:BIO requirements --Ozgod (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ I checked the article and now it seems to be organized with proper provided references. --Marshall 17:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)SireMarshall (talk • contribs) — SireMarshall (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment: to my count, there is currently 4 news sources; DNA, The Statesman and 2 Telegraph articles. The Statesman mentions that S.K. led a squad in West Bengal, but no bio info. [11] says that she's a woman in her 20s from Andhra Pradesh. [12] says that she's a woman in her early 20s from Jharkhand. [13] goes into more details. One can suppose that all of the info originates from the Intelligence Branch (IB) of the West Bengal police. I find that there is a real problem of verifiablity here. Also, an open question is whether being a squad commander (leading tens of soldiers) is enough notability for a bio article. Could there be any confirmation of position inside the party, I'd say that being a state committee or central committee member would be a minimum for notability of a leader inside the party. --Soman (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.