Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUPREME Food Market

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirected after deleting. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SUPREME Food Market

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non notable supermarket. There's a lack of coverage in the media and no indication this market is unique enough or notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry at this time. Dianna (talk) 01:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A supermarket that has been open less than a week. Not yet notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Royal Supermarket where it is mentioned as a sister/competitor (though the Royal Supermarket article itself has issues). It's unlikely it will establish much notability at this time if it opened this year in January. It's possible there are other news articles, probably non-English, but the current information is not appropriate and reads like an advertisement (store security and detailed section about rewards program). I tried using Google News to search for more sources but didn't find any so it's probably received attention solely in China. SwisterTwister talk 20:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnotable and promotional. . . Mean as custard (talk) 14:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.