Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQuORE
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Secret account 06:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
SQuORE
- SQuORE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable third party sources, only primary sources. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 10:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm the author of this web page. Thank you for your interest in my prose. Let me elaborate more on this:
- As a matter of fact I'm working with the team developing SQuORE; nevertheless I aim to be as objective as one can be for wikipedia -- no bullshit. Your feedback and comments are much appreciated.
- As for the primary sources, I've replaced the links by third-party documents (But ICSSEA has not yet published articles presented in 2012, by the way). I'll add more secondary sources soon.
Boris Baldassari (Talk) 13:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any third-party documents; all I see is a link to the ICSSEA 2012 conference home page. Are there any specific papers from the proceedings which were written by authors unconnected with SQuORE? If so, please add references to them. It doesn't matter if the proceedings aren't available online yet. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've changed the first reference to point to the RTS official website and added another link to the schneider electric official website. For ICSSEA unfortunately I just have to wait for the proceedings. I also added two external (3rd-party) references (mesures and programmez). However the journal articles are written in french, don't know if foreign references are ok -- both are well-known and established french journals. I should get new references soon which I will add as soon as possible. Is the current article good enough now to wait for them? Thanks, Boris Baldassari (Talk) 10:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The press release from Schneider Electric is not a reliable source because Schneider and SQuORING have a business relationship; the announcement is simply a means of promoting each other's products and services. The French articles seem to be OK (and no, there's no problem using non-English references) at first glance—I'm not familiar with those journals so I'm not sure if they're just regurgitating official press releases as many publications do. I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for now. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've changed the first reference to point to the RTS official website and added another link to the schneider electric official website. For ICSSEA unfortunately I just have to wait for the proceedings. I also added two external (3rd-party) references (mesures and programmez). However the journal articles are written in french, don't know if foreign references are ok -- both are well-known and established french journals. I should get new references soon which I will add as soon as possible. Is the current article good enough now to wait for them? Thanks, Boris Baldassari (Talk) 10:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to apparently reliable coverage in French tech journals. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.