Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKIL Bill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SKIL Bill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bill does not look to have gone anywhere, and sourcing is scarce. There are no inline citations, but a pile of ELs at the bottom, almost all of them primary and/or partisan/low quality, which don't look to amount to notability. It looks like this bill was introduced perhaps three times, but never got so far as a vote (unless I'm misreading). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 13:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.