Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMON Short Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SIMON Short Film

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very premature. There is currently no no coverage of this project in reliable third-party sources. This is to be expected: the film is still in pre-production, it's a short film (so less likely to be the subject of in-depth coverage in any case) and it's written and directed by a pair of filmmakers that do not appear to be notable themselves. (Note that an earlier PROD tag was removed) Pichpich (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Also obvious COI, see User:Polexican and User:LeslieHarro , both which have not made userpages but wrote this article and are mentioned in it. Also, this short film doesn't have a title yet... ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all for any notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

alts:

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer/producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for being (at kindest) TOO SOON. The two individuals Adam Kowalik and Leslie Harro appear to be names otherwise related to films but I can find nothing connecting them to a SIMON short film. There is a film by this name but with different cast & crew that made the rounds in 2015, but nothing by Kowalik and Harro as a predictive for 2016. Short films always have a tough time, but completely lacking any type of sourcability, smells a bit HOAXEY. If it ever becomes notable the topic can always be revisited. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - they can try again when they have sources and notability. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - NOT anyone with a conflict of interest. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable. Mhhossein (talk) 11:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.