Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sóc Sơn, Hanoi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Lithopsian (talk) 17:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sóc Sơn, Hanoi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A recently expanded redirect about the capital township of the target district, and the author is insisting on keeping the article. Notability is dubious and it currently contains no information that isn't at the target article. Seems to be part of a campaign to mass create stubs for the capital townships of every district, around Hanoi, at least. Lithopsian (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. My proposal appears to have been flawed, or at least poorly expressed. Also, 30ChuaPhaiLaTet has been blocked as a sock and most edits have been rolled back, so discussing them further seems pointless. Lithopsian (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lithopsian Some other provinces, like Bac Giang Province, Bac Lieu Province, ... have stubs about every small communes and villages. Just look at these, Template:Bac Giang Province, Template:Bac Lieu Province. So why can't I create one? Those created stubs are about every single villages, and they also had a single line simply stating that it is a village of the district (yet they have been existing for 10 years now). Meanwhile I'm only creating stubs about the district capitals (which is obviously more notable). If you keep insisting on deleting mine, then you should also consider deleting every articles in those templates that I listed 30ChuaPhaiLaTet (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If it’s a district capital why is it not notable under WP:GEOLAND? Mccapra (talk) 21:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep don't use deletion requests as fora to air other complaints, use deletion review etc. if necessary. I'd assume all administrative entities like this are notable. —innotata 21:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
comment WP:GEOLAND would imply that a town which is the capital of a region would surely be notable. Mangoe (talk) 00:12, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If its not notable it should be merged back, not deleted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.