Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Séd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that there is available sourcing to be had, as well as some more information written out in the Hungarian version (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Séd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub with no sources for at least a decade, cannot find anything else other than a few passing mentions elsewhere. KKFeline (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. KKFeline (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It can be expanded with content from the Hungarian Wikipedia article, where there is a book from the year 2000 as a source, with a title which translates as "The valley of the Sed in Veszprém". RebeccaGreen (talk) 02:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is at least real. But "patak" means stream. And I believe that "nevezetesebb patakok" on Fényes 1841, p. 403 means "the more notable streams", although someone else should double-check that, with the Séd being given its own numbered item above them. Uncle G (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Dukay, Igor (2012-09-21). "A Séd patak revitalizációja" (in Hungarian). Mátyásfa Egyesület.
- Fényes, Elek (1841). "Veszprém Vámegye". Magyar orszagnak, 's a' hozza kapcsolt tartomanyoknak mostani allapotja statistikai es geographiai tekintetben. Vol. 1. Pest: Trattner-Karolyi. (1836 edition at the Internet Archive)
Keep the principle watercourse in the city of Veszprém (with it's own hiking route [1]) and a major landscape feature elsewhere ([2]).----Pontificalibus 10:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NGEO and WP:GNG, a quick WP:BEFORE would have shown it appears on gmaps (here), and the importance of the Séd to the area in relation to milling ie. "A Séd-völgy malmai", a couple of "geotours" of the Séd area, a history teachers conference talk that mentions (note no. 53) that there were 8 mills during the 1800s, article about Séd's Kopácsy mill. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, i have added a link to Hungarian WP page on article talkpage for ease of access, and added the rivers project so that rivereditors are aware of the article. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.