Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryn Lilley

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 12:53, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryn Lilley

Ryn Lilley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable author. None of the refs are reliable sources for notability. And, just as significantly, none of the books are even in WorldCat. So it it is not at all surprising to find that her principal work (the Young adult trilogy) is self-published. DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete fails WP:CREATIVE. Sourcing is mostly their own website. LibStar (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- strictly a vanity page with intricate details, such as of an accident, chronic pain, so quite possibly written by someone close to the subject. I cannot locate any independent RS, so WP:NAUTHOR is not met. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.