Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthin Craft Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KTC (talk) 20:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ruthin Craft Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local centre with only local references DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ Keep - though the BBC news source is indeed local-ish, the architecture of the new building has attracted a great deal of publicity and recognition - for example winning the Dewi-Prys Thomas Prize 2009 [1], shortlisted for the Art Fund Prize 2009 [2], singled out by the Welsh Government's Design Commission for Wales [3] and profiled in at least one of the architectural magazines [4] and a 2010 book [5]. Sionk (talk) 00:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Sionk above, which architecturally amounts to a strong keep! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 10:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, certainly 'keep'. Sometimes I'm cagey about being too much swayed by my interest in modern architecture. Sionk (talk) 11:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.