Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruthie's Rolling Cafe
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ruthie's Rolling Cafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Apparently no coverage outside the Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas area apart from a one-off holiday-season piece[1] on the Today show. Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:17, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to List of food trucks. May not be notable enough for a standalone article, but a merge will improve the merge target article, per WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 18:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think that is an excellent proposal. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete instead as there's actually nothing better to suggest saving and not improving, having the article then vulnerable to restoring with no adequate improvements; my searches only found a few links, certainly nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 06:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Oppose a merge, since the proposed target article says it is a list of NOTABLE food trucks and "not a comprehensive list of all food trucks companies." If we are agreed that this food truck is not notable, it doesn't belong at that list. --MelanieN (talk) 22:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.