Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupali Chakankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rupali Chakankar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence doesn’t satisfy WP:GNG. Subject also doesn’t seem to satisfy WP:NPOL either. I should also add that subject of article is the “President of the non notable women wing of a political party” A before search shows 0 evidence of notability Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the content which don't have relivent reference.so please keep this article.i am trying to add more references, i need some time.thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabh2040 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify or Keep, the article needs quite a bit of cleanup but Chakankar should otherwise pass WP:GNG. She has pretty frequent coverage at least in Marathi press. A WP:BEFORE search for me produces these references among others which should be enough to demonstrate so.^[1][2][3] Tayi Arajakate _Talk 02:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rupali Chakankar article is clean up and added more specific references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saurabh2040 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The subjects fails WP:NPOL as of now. Because, she has not won any election yet or held any state office till date. -Hatchens (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a non-notable party functionary.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - clearly fails WP:NPOL as per above and no evidence of WP:GNG being met Spiderone 14:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.