Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolf Elias Peersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolf Elias Peersen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing singificant given by this article and remains unsourced. Pretty much useless to a user of WP. Theprussian (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Obviously notable. Needs expansion rather than deletion. See for example [1]. --Michig (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep – If he was a parliamentary minister then he would be very notable, as MPs are automatically. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 21:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The answer to "remains unsourced" is to add sources. (It took me about half a minute to find one.) The answer to "Nothing singificant [sic] given by this article" is to add content. Being a member of a national parliament is a pretty solid indication of notability, and the fact that he was minister of defence in a national government (albeit briefly) consolidates that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, nominator needs to remember WP:CONTN - "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article." Coolabahapple (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:ANYBIO with an entry in Norsk biografisk leksikon, also there has been an article in norwegian wikipedia since 2009/10 with no issues that can provide further info about Peersen. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets notability given a) elected politician and b) serving as minister of defense, even if only briefly. The article needs work, not deletion _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 15:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Important not to confuse article quality with notability. Montanabw^(talk) 06:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.